Thursday, December 04, 2014
Black Pol won't understand the truth
December 3, 2014
Maybe, just maybe, enough of decent Americans have read, heard and saw with their own eyes exactly what went down with the Brown shooting….Brown as a 6’6 250-300 pound thug that has been allowed to do as he pleased by every one in Ferguson, so he enters a store with his friend, they both steal what they want and when the owner complains, Brown assaults him! Those are facts in the video. Second, his friend lied right off to the police and is now facing the possibility of a perjury charge. Third many of the witnesses changed their stories when they were put under oath…with one exception they all testified that Brown wrestled Wilson while in the car and when Wilson got out to follow him, Brown turned around and charged repeatedly. The one exception was a witness that admitted that they were even there to witness anything, just put together what they heard. For the protestors and the black caucus members, it must be said over and over again, they have been brainwashed since birth to believe in the Black Liberation Theology which condemns the white man. There is no way you can get the representative to see, hear for comprehend the truth…they do not hear it, see it or comprehend it. All we can do is control the destruction, lawlessness as best we can and arrest any and all that deserve it and charge them! President Obama along with Holder and his supporters has been attempting to start a race war in this country…where and whom do we think put the military equipment into the hands of the police? If the police, mayor, governor of every city under siege doesn’t bring some control, you will see hundreds killed, hurt and/or maimed. No wonder President Obama has tried to twist Fox News to suit his political ideology….when the rest of the media 98% are so radically extreme Leftist it is hard to know the truth. For the representative and his supporters, more white men have been killed during an arrest from 2003-2009 2,026 black men 1,529 Hispanic men 949. White on black crime 62,593 and black on white crime 320,082. The black people are more racist than any other race in America….
Progressive ideology "BuBWhite"
December 4, 2014
Gee Bud...I realize that you are "for" Obama however, the majority of people here see reality as it is, not as Progressives aka Democrats do. They see their perception of reality as real...it's not! Before his "mentor" plucked him up he was a normal young person: dressed according to the times, smoke weed and partied. If you can understand why he is called the most racist then much of what you write is wrong. Fact, he followed the Black Liberation Theology for over 20 years (longer with his mentor) with Reverend Wright...a philosophy of hate and racism again white people. Or you could call it "neocolonialism" which is what they taught throughout the world. When the Progressives could not get control in the l880 presidential election, they rethought their strategy to "transform": America...so in 1933 they merged with the Democrats. The Progressive ideology began in Europe with Jews trying to (in my opinion) figure out how to make the world a fairer, more decent planet and they came up with tikkun olam...everyone is 100% equal...sounds great with one small problem it was used as an excuse for despots to assume power in the 20th century: Hitler, Stalin, Mao all touted some form of totalitarian rule for 100% equality...Progressives hated the Founding Fathers and, if I wasn't so old would spend the next 25 years digging into who they really were. I think they were in America at its founding and when it was founded as it was, those that didn't want that kind of government went to England or Europe, many went to Canada but, those committed to the cause, progressives, stayed and believed they could "transform" us once they got the power...the rest is history Bud. But remember, Founding Fathers are now hated throughout the land...bottom line: authoritarian rule is in the future of the world...it was for nearly 300,000 years and since were only an "experiment" it will return because humans are what they are.
Those "unintended" consequences come home to roost
December 4, 2014
Although I didn't vote for Obama and was aware of his ideology and politics, I thought "give him a chance"...so I did...gee not even out of the gate he tours the world basically condemning America and encouraging democracy throughout the Middle East....how's that going for him? Hundreds of thousands dead, millions displaced, starvation and then ISIS. A group of blood thirsty terrorists that decapitate, mutilate anyone and everyone in their path...rape and pillage no matter the age, babies tortured and throats slit and President Obama never saw the horror his words unleashed because he didn't and I believe still does not understand the Koran and its dictates followed by 1.3 billion people..just as he does not understand the African Americans point of view because he never lived it! He didn't participate in the Civil Rights Movement, Women's Movement or view the US as an exceptional country that was able to walk on the moon. His Black Liberation Theology rules all and so "Holder" will investigate the Brown, Garner and Cleveland shootings....does he know that between 2003-2009 more whites died at the hands of the police, 2,026 versus black 1,529 or Hispanics 949? Does he now that white on black crimes are 62,593 and black on white crimes are 320,082??? Does he even care if he knew? He sounds like the "hands up" politicians who are so indoctrinated by decades of progressive aka democrat "plantation" philosophy...they are truly deaf, dumb and blind to the reality of this country and the world. They have been taught since birth that "perception of reality" is true. After spending $8 Trillion dollars throwing money at every problem that crosses his desk, has he given one nano second to what he has wrought and what his legacy will be: The First Black President who destroy America....does he or will he care?
Tuesday, December 02, 2014
Sunday, November 16, 2014
The Facts
November 14, 2014
FACTS:
Let's list the actual facts: The progressives tried to get elected but lost to Lincoln in l880 and reorganized themselves and merged with the Democrat Party in 1933 after realizing the the Presidency was really not that powerful...they proceeded to get themselves into every level of government and education, especially colleges throughout America....they follow a philosophy that sounded noble: equality for all, justice for all, fairness and goodness for all. But, they require that you think like they do, do as they say. They started brainwashing the children in the l950's...soared in the l960's, got many changes in the l970's and got temporarily stopped during Reagan...but they got themselves into everything so when Clinton was elected they went back to their "changes" and because Hillary was a progressive herself and wife of the Prez she thought she could create and ram healthcare through....you will note that you cannot read her thesis from college...nor Obama's for that matter. By the time Bush came to office, their hate campaign had already been in full swing attacking anyone who would not bow to them..lives were ruined, people destroyed...we, the majority of people, began to wake and realize we had let our country get taken by the marxist/stalinists calling themselves Progressive aka Democrats. Hillary was supposed to have taken the mantle after Bush because the hate machine was in full power but the Obama mentors got it for him instead....and for that I say thanks to them, because had it been the other way around, we would not be America today. Anyone who honestly believes that Obama governs America is wrong...his mentors do one of which is Valerie Jarrett. The others were put into position of power in all the agencies did their changes and left....does anyone wonder why almost every government agency today is "incompetent"..from the Secret Service to the Veterans Administration...now for those who use name calling and make statements that are rude, guys, you have been Gruberized since birth...this America, still, and everyone gets to have their say without being beaten by HATE!
Saturday, October 25, 2014
What the future may look like, circa '08 and 2010
October 16, 2007
Posterity will decide!!
This needs to be kept for posterity because, if the tinfoil hatted leftist loons win in 2008 and 2010, history as we know it will begin to disappear and be replaced everywhere with only tinfoil hatted leftist loon writings on all subjects. Kristallnacht will be no more, in my opinion, but Hitler will be elevated and possibly revered. No, I'm not crazy. A lifetime of study into the human character tells me that this is certainly a possibility. It is difficult to trust a populace that has almost done away with the rules that have us partially human for hundreds of years in just three quarters of a century,. Plunged the U.S. into a country where it is demanded by many that they "be given" things to better their lives without any effort on their part. As an example, the apartments for the alcoholics where they can live while drinking themselves to death. A country where the most insane of us "must" be allowed the choice to live on the streets because to be cared for is against their civil liberties. A country where screaming, lying and cheating at the top of your lungs is acceptable behavior if you are on the Left like John Edwards, Dennis Kunich, Bernie Sanders. Barack Obama, Hillary, Al Gore or George Soros, do, to name just a minuscule number of fellow travellers. Those of you who are family members please remember that I passed this on and lift a glass in my memory when what Herbert Meyer wrote comes to fruition! Because come it will, one way or another.
SueMom, Sister, Aunt, Associate, Friend, Concerned Citizen
of the Universe July 12, 2007
* * * * * *
THE WAR ABOUT THE WAR
By Herbert Meyer,
Perception One: We're at War
For the third time in history Islam - or, more precisely, its most radical element - has launched a war whose objective is the destruction of Western civilization. Our survival is at stake, and despite its imperfections we believe that Western civilization is worth defending to the death. Moreover, in the modern world - where a small number of people can so easily kill a large number of people - we cannot just play defense; sooner or later that strategy would bring another 9-11. This conflict really is a clash of civilizations whose root cause is Islam's incompatibility with the modern world. So we must fight with everything we've got against the terrorist groups and against those governments on whose support they rely. If the Cold War was "World War III," this is World War IV. We must win it, at whatever cost.
Perception Two: We're Reaping What We've Sowed
There are quite a few people in the world who just don't like the United States and some of our allies because of how we live and, more precisely, because of the policies we pursue in the Mideast and elsewhere in the world. Alas, a small percentage of these people express their opposition through acts of violence. While we sometimes share their opinion of our values and our policies, we cannot condone their methods. Our objective must be to bring the level of political violence down to an acceptable level. The only way to accomplish this will be to simultaneously adjust our values and our policies while protecting ourselves from these intermittent acts of violence; in doing so we must be careful never to allow the need for security to override our civil liberties.
There is no middle ground between these two perceptions. Of course, you can change a word here and there, or modify a phrase, but the result will be the same. Either we're at war, or we've entered a period of history in which the level of violence has risen to an unacceptable level. If we're at war, we're in a military conflict that will end with either our victory or our defeat. If we're in an era of unacceptable violence stemming from our values and our policies, we are faced with a difficult but manageable political problem.
Splitting the Difference
Since the 9-11 attacks, President Bush has been trying to split the difference. It's obvious that he, personally, subscribes to Perception One. Just read his formal speeches about the conflict, such as those he's given to Congress and at venues such as West Point. They are superb and often brilliant analyses of what he calls the War on Terror. Yet he hasn't done things that a president who truly believes that we're at war should have done. For instance, in the aftermath of 9-11 he didn't ask Congress for a declaration of war, didn't bring back the draft, and didn't put the US economy on a wartime footing. A president at war would have taken out Iran's government after overthrowing the Taliban in Afghanistan -- and then sent 500,000 troops into Iraq, rather than just enough troops to remove Saddam Hussein but not enough to stabilize that country. And a president at war would have long since disposed of Syria's murderous regime and helped the Israelis wipe out Hezbollah.
Study history, and you quickly learn that oftentimes events and the responses they generate look different a hundred years after they happen than they look at the time. It may be that history will judge that President Bush performed heroically, doing the very best that anyone could do given the two incompatible perceptions about the conflict that have divided public opinion and raised the level of partisanship in Washington to such a poisonous level. Or, it may be that history will judge the President to have been a failure because he responded to 9-11 as a politician rather than as a leader.
Either way, it is the ongoing war about the war that accounts for where we are today, nearly six years after the 9-11 attacks: We haven't lost, but we aren't winning; fewer of us have been killed by terrorists than we had feared would be killed, but we aren't safe.
While experts disagree about how "the war" is going, there isn't much disagreement over how the war about the war is going: those who subscribe to Perception Two are pulling ahead.
Here in the US, virtually every poll shows that a majority of Americans want us "out of Iraq" sooner rather than later, and regardless of what's actually happening on the ground in that country. Support for taking on Iran - that is, for separating the Mullahs from the nukes through either a military strike or by helping Iranians to overthrow them from within - is too low even to measure. There isn't one candidate for president in either party who's campaigning on a theme of "let's fight harder and win this thing whatever it takes." Indeed, the most hawkish position is merely to stay the course a while longer to give the current "surge" in Iraq a fair chance. Moreover, just chat with friends and neighbors - at barbeques, at the barbershop, over a cup of coffee - and you'll be hard-pressed to find a solid minority, let alone a majority, in favor of fighting-to-win.
However it's phrased, just about everyone is looking for a way out short of victory.
Overseas, public opinion is moving in the same direction. For example, in Great Britain Tony Blair has stepped aside for Gordon Brown, who in the midst of the recent terrorist attacks in London and Glasgow has ordered his government to ban the phrase "war on terror" and to avoid publicly linking the recent, mercifully failed attacks in London and Glasgow to any aspect of Islam. The current leaders of Germany and France are less anti-American than their predecessors, but no more willing to help us fight. Down under in Australia John Howard - blessed be his name - is holding firm, but for a combination of reasons may be approaching the end of his long tenure; none of his likely replacements are nearly so robust. And the Israelis - who are facing the triple-threat of Hamas, Hezbollah, and before too long a nuclear-armed Iran - are going through one of their periodic bouts of political paralysis.
A Second Attack
It's possible that something horrific will happen in the immediate future to shift public support here in the US, and throughout the West, from the second perception to the first. When asked by a young reporter what he thought would have the greatest impact on his government's fate, British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan responded cheerfully: "Events, dear boy, events." One more 9-11-type attack - biological, chemical, or nuclear - that takes out Houston, Berlin, Vancouver or Paris, and the leader of that country will be overwhelmed by the furious public's demands to "turn the creeps who did this, and the countries that helped them, into molten glass and don't let's worry about collateral damage." (This will sound even better in French or German.) Should the next big attack come here in the US, some among us will blame the President but most won't. The public mood will be not merely ferocious, but ugly; you won't want to walk down the street wearing an "I gave to the ACLU" pin in your lapel.
Absent such an event in the near future, it's likely that over the next few years the war will settle into a phase that proponents of Perception Two will approve. Simply put, we will shift from offense to defense. The Department of Homeland Security will become our government's lead agency, and the Pentagon's role will be diminished. (Nothing will change at the State Department - but then, nothing ever does.) Most people in the US, and elsewhere in the West, will be relieved that "the war" is finally over.
To preserve the peace we will have to be more than willing to make the occasional accommodation to Moslems. If they ask us to put more pressure on the Israelis - well, we can easily do that. If Moslem checkout clerks at our supermarkets don't want to touch pork - by all means let's have separate checkout counters for customers who've bought those products. And now that we think about it, "Happy Winter" will be as good a greeting, if not a better one, than "Merry Christmas." Won't it?
Of course, there will be the occasional terrorist attack. Some, like the recent ones in London and Glasgow, will fail. Others will succeed, but guided by the mainstream media we will view them with the same detachment as we would view a meteor shower that brought flaming rocks crashing randomly into the Earth. Most will land harmlessly in fields, some will land on houses and kill those few residents unlucky enough to be home at the time. Once in a while, one will crash into a crowded shopping mall or, sadly, into a school packed with children. These things happen - alas - and while it's riveting to watch the latest disaster unfold on television there really isn't much one can do about it. Life goes on.
In the long run, history always sorts things out.
If it turns out that Perception Two of the threat is valid, then over time we will become accustomed to the level of casualties caused by the terrorists. After all, more than 40,000 Americans are killed each year in traffic accidents and we don't make a big political issue out of that, do we? Our attitude toward death-by-terrorist-attack will be the same as our attitude toward deaths on the highway: a tragedy for the victim and members of the family, but nothing really to fuss over. And if Perception Two is valid, it's even possible that the terrorist threat eventually will ease. Can you even remember the last time anyone got bombed by the IRA?
But if those of us who subscribe to Perception One are correct, then it's only a matter of time before something ghastly happens that will swing public opinion throughout the West our way - and hard. Whether this will happen in two years, or five, or in 15 years, is impossible to predict. All we can know for certain is that if Western civilization really is under attack from Islam, or from elements within Islam, then they will not give up or be appeased. At some point they're going to go for the knockout punch.
Fighting, Finally, to Win
The pessimists among us will argue that by this time we'll be too far gone to save; that years of merely playing defense and of making concessions to the sensitivities of our enemy will have eroded our military power, and sapped our will, to the point where de facto surrender will be the only option.
We optimists see things differently: For better or worse, it's part of the American character to wait until the last possible moment - even to wait a bit beyond the last possible moment - before kicking into high gear and getting the job done. It's in our genes; just think of how many times you've ground enamel off your teeth watching your own kid waste an entire weekend, only to start writing a book report at 10:30 Sunday night that, when you find it on the breakfast table Monday morning is by some miracle a minor masterpiece.
However horrific it may be, the knockout punch won't knock us out. Instead, it will shift us from playing defense back to offense - and this time we won't hold back. The president will ask Congress for a declaration of war and he, or she, will get it. We'll bring back the draft, send our troops into battle without one hand tied behind their backs by lawyers, and we won't waste time and energy pussyfooting with the United Nations. And if we've closed GITMO by this time - we'll reopen it and even double its size because we're going to pack it. All of this will take longer to organize, and cost more, than if we'd done it right in the aftermath of 9-11. That's unfortunate, but that's the way we Americans tend to do things. And when we do finally start fighting for real -- we'll win.
Posterity will decide!!
This needs to be kept for posterity because, if the tinfoil hatted leftist loons win in 2008 and 2010, history as we know it will begin to disappear and be replaced everywhere with only tinfoil hatted leftist loon writings on all subjects. Kristallnacht will be no more, in my opinion, but Hitler will be elevated and possibly revered. No, I'm not crazy. A lifetime of study into the human character tells me that this is certainly a possibility. It is difficult to trust a populace that has almost done away with the rules that have us partially human for hundreds of years in just three quarters of a century,. Plunged the U.S. into a country where it is demanded by many that they "be given" things to better their lives without any effort on their part. As an example, the apartments for the alcoholics where they can live while drinking themselves to death. A country where the most insane of us "must" be allowed the choice to live on the streets because to be cared for is against their civil liberties. A country where screaming, lying and cheating at the top of your lungs is acceptable behavior if you are on the Left like John Edwards, Dennis Kunich, Bernie Sanders. Barack Obama, Hillary, Al Gore or George Soros, do, to name just a minuscule number of fellow travellers. Those of you who are family members please remember that I passed this on and lift a glass in my memory when what Herbert Meyer wrote comes to fruition! Because come it will, one way or another.
SueMom, Sister, Aunt, Associate, Friend, Concerned Citizen
of the Universe July 12, 2007
* * * * * *
THE WAR ABOUT THE WAR
By Herbert Meyer,
Herbert E. Meyer served during the Reagan Administration as Special Assistant to the Director of Central Intelligence and Vice Chairman of the CIA's National Intelligence Council. He is host and producer of The Siege of Western Civilization and author of How to Analyze Information .
The 9-11 attacks did more than start a war; they started a war about the war. No sooner had the World Trade towers collapsed and the Pentagon burst into flames than two perceptions of the threat began competing for the public's support:Perception One: We're at War
For the third time in history Islam - or, more precisely, its most radical element - has launched a war whose objective is the destruction of Western civilization. Our survival is at stake, and despite its imperfections we believe that Western civilization is worth defending to the death. Moreover, in the modern world - where a small number of people can so easily kill a large number of people - we cannot just play defense; sooner or later that strategy would bring another 9-11. This conflict really is a clash of civilizations whose root cause is Islam's incompatibility with the modern world. So we must fight with everything we've got against the terrorist groups and against those governments on whose support they rely. If the Cold War was "World War III," this is World War IV. We must win it, at whatever cost.
There are quite a few people in the world who just don't like the United States and some of our allies because of how we live and, more precisely, because of the policies we pursue in the Mideast and elsewhere in the world. Alas, a small percentage of these people express their opposition through acts of violence. While we sometimes share their opinion of our values and our policies, we cannot condone their methods. Our objective must be to bring the level of political violence down to an acceptable level. The only way to accomplish this will be to simultaneously adjust our values and our policies while protecting ourselves from these intermittent acts of violence; in doing so we must be careful never to allow the need for security to override our civil liberties.
There is no middle ground between these two perceptions. Of course, you can change a word here and there, or modify a phrase, but the result will be the same. Either we're at war, or we've entered a period of history in which the level of violence has risen to an unacceptable level. If we're at war, we're in a military conflict that will end with either our victory or our defeat. If we're in an era of unacceptable violence stemming from our values and our policies, we are faced with a difficult but manageable political problem.
Splitting the Difference
Since the 9-11 attacks, President Bush has been trying to split the difference. It's obvious that he, personally, subscribes to Perception One. Just read his formal speeches about the conflict, such as those he's given to Congress and at venues such as West Point. They are superb and often brilliant analyses of what he calls the War on Terror. Yet he hasn't done things that a president who truly believes that we're at war should have done. For instance, in the aftermath of 9-11 he didn't ask Congress for a declaration of war, didn't bring back the draft, and didn't put the US economy on a wartime footing. A president at war would have taken out Iran's government after overthrowing the Taliban in Afghanistan -- and then sent 500,000 troops into Iraq, rather than just enough troops to remove Saddam Hussein but not enough to stabilize that country. And a president at war would have long since disposed of Syria's murderous regime and helped the Israelis wipe out Hezbollah.
Study history, and you quickly learn that oftentimes events and the responses they generate look different a hundred years after they happen than they look at the time. It may be that history will judge that President Bush performed heroically, doing the very best that anyone could do given the two incompatible perceptions about the conflict that have divided public opinion and raised the level of partisanship in Washington to such a poisonous level. Or, it may be that history will judge the President to have been a failure because he responded to 9-11 as a politician rather than as a leader.
Either way, it is the ongoing war about the war that accounts for where we are today, nearly six years after the 9-11 attacks: We haven't lost, but we aren't winning; fewer of us have been killed by terrorists than we had feared would be killed, but we aren't safe.
While experts disagree about how "the war" is going, there isn't much disagreement over how the war about the war is going: those who subscribe to Perception Two are pulling ahead.
Here in the US, virtually every poll shows that a majority of Americans want us "out of Iraq" sooner rather than later, and regardless of what's actually happening on the ground in that country. Support for taking on Iran - that is, for separating the Mullahs from the nukes through either a military strike or by helping Iranians to overthrow them from within - is too low even to measure. There isn't one candidate for president in either party who's campaigning on a theme of "let's fight harder and win this thing whatever it takes." Indeed, the most hawkish position is merely to stay the course a while longer to give the current "surge" in Iraq a fair chance. Moreover, just chat with friends and neighbors - at barbeques, at the barbershop, over a cup of coffee - and you'll be hard-pressed to find a solid minority, let alone a majority, in favor of fighting-to-win.
However it's phrased, just about everyone is looking for a way out short of victory.
Overseas, public opinion is moving in the same direction. For example, in Great Britain Tony Blair has stepped aside for Gordon Brown, who in the midst of the recent terrorist attacks in London and Glasgow has ordered his government to ban the phrase "war on terror" and to avoid publicly linking the recent, mercifully failed attacks in London and Glasgow to any aspect of Islam. The current leaders of Germany and France are less anti-American than their predecessors, but no more willing to help us fight. Down under in Australia John Howard - blessed be his name - is holding firm, but for a combination of reasons may be approaching the end of his long tenure; none of his likely replacements are nearly so robust. And the Israelis - who are facing the triple-threat of Hamas, Hezbollah, and before too long a nuclear-armed Iran - are going through one of their periodic bouts of political paralysis.
A Second Attack
It's possible that something horrific will happen in the immediate future to shift public support here in the US, and throughout the West, from the second perception to the first. When asked by a young reporter what he thought would have the greatest impact on his government's fate, British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan responded cheerfully: "Events, dear boy, events." One more 9-11-type attack - biological, chemical, or nuclear - that takes out Houston, Berlin, Vancouver or Paris, and the leader of that country will be overwhelmed by the furious public's demands to "turn the creeps who did this, and the countries that helped them, into molten glass and don't let's worry about collateral damage." (This will sound even better in French or German.) Should the next big attack come here in the US, some among us will blame the President but most won't. The public mood will be not merely ferocious, but ugly; you won't want to walk down the street wearing an "I gave to the ACLU" pin in your lapel.
Absent such an event in the near future, it's likely that over the next few years the war will settle into a phase that proponents of Perception Two will approve. Simply put, we will shift from offense to defense. The Department of Homeland Security will become our government's lead agency, and the Pentagon's role will be diminished. (Nothing will change at the State Department - but then, nothing ever does.) Most people in the US, and elsewhere in the West, will be relieved that "the war" is finally over.
To preserve the peace we will have to be more than willing to make the occasional accommodation to Moslems. If they ask us to put more pressure on the Israelis - well, we can easily do that. If Moslem checkout clerks at our supermarkets don't want to touch pork - by all means let's have separate checkout counters for customers who've bought those products. And now that we think about it, "Happy Winter" will be as good a greeting, if not a better one, than "Merry Christmas." Won't it?
Of course, there will be the occasional terrorist attack. Some, like the recent ones in London and Glasgow, will fail. Others will succeed, but guided by the mainstream media we will view them with the same detachment as we would view a meteor shower that brought flaming rocks crashing randomly into the Earth. Most will land harmlessly in fields, some will land on houses and kill those few residents unlucky enough to be home at the time. Once in a while, one will crash into a crowded shopping mall or, sadly, into a school packed with children. These things happen - alas - and while it's riveting to watch the latest disaster unfold on television there really isn't much one can do about it. Life goes on.
In the long run, history always sorts things out.
If it turns out that Perception Two of the threat is valid, then over time we will become accustomed to the level of casualties caused by the terrorists. After all, more than 40,000 Americans are killed each year in traffic accidents and we don't make a big political issue out of that, do we? Our attitude toward death-by-terrorist-attack will be the same as our attitude toward deaths on the highway: a tragedy for the victim and members of the family, but nothing really to fuss over. And if Perception Two is valid, it's even possible that the terrorist threat eventually will ease. Can you even remember the last time anyone got bombed by the IRA?
But if those of us who subscribe to Perception One are correct, then it's only a matter of time before something ghastly happens that will swing public opinion throughout the West our way - and hard. Whether this will happen in two years, or five, or in 15 years, is impossible to predict. All we can know for certain is that if Western civilization really is under attack from Islam, or from elements within Islam, then they will not give up or be appeased. At some point they're going to go for the knockout punch.
Fighting, Finally, to Win
The pessimists among us will argue that by this time we'll be too far gone to save; that years of merely playing defense and of making concessions to the sensitivities of our enemy will have eroded our military power, and sapped our will, to the point where de facto surrender will be the only option.
We optimists see things differently: For better or worse, it's part of the American character to wait until the last possible moment - even to wait a bit beyond the last possible moment - before kicking into high gear and getting the job done. It's in our genes; just think of how many times you've ground enamel off your teeth watching your own kid waste an entire weekend, only to start writing a book report at 10:30 Sunday night that, when you find it on the breakfast table Monday morning is by some miracle a minor masterpiece.
However horrific it may be, the knockout punch won't knock us out. Instead, it will shift us from playing defense back to offense - and this time we won't hold back. The president will ask Congress for a declaration of war and he, or she, will get it. We'll bring back the draft, send our troops into battle without one hand tied behind their backs by lawyers, and we won't waste time and energy pussyfooting with the United Nations. And if we've closed GITMO by this time - we'll reopen it and even double its size because we're going to pack it. All of this will take longer to organize, and cost more, than if we'd done it right in the aftermath of 9-11. That's unfortunate, but that's the way we Americans tend to do things. And when we do finally start fighting for real -- we'll win.
Herbert E. Meyer served during the Reagan Administration as Special Assistant to the Director of Central Intelligence and Vice Chairman of the CIA's National Intelligence Council.
Control of America - 2014
Control of America, Obama in 2014
October 25, 2014
Control of the human race ended for the West after WWII....however, the progressives, who had tried for decades to infiltrate the federal government were unsuccessful until the l900's when most of our presidents were progressives...they discovered however that a President, at least in the beginning of the last century didn't have the power they sought, so they began to get themselves into federal agencies...but, even that was not enough to gain control completely, so they merged with the Democratic Party in 1933...by stealth they began to get into education, city, county, state and federal government at all levels....by the l960's they had attained enough power and adherents like Saul Alinsky to set their next moves...while the alcohol prohibition created serious problems and Margaret Sanger's racist and gender policies were not accepted, they did give the progs a structure to follows into the rest of l960's...television helped and did the movies to introduce their philosophy and began to change America substiantially. I believe that Barack Obama was not supposed to become the President until after Hillary Clinton so that the stage for a complete "transformation" could occur. They got greedy and knocked Hillary out of the running and the last 6 years even Obama could not give his allies the control they sought. Americans still have a couple of years to prepare to stop Hillary...if not, then anyone over 50 will not recognize what we will be come.
Thursday, September 11, 2014
What have Progressives aka Democrats wrought???
I sit here, a 7 decades old lady, and would cry if I thought there was any hope for this great country. There isn't. President Obama, his supporters and allies did not, do not nor will they understand the threat that Islam via any group you wish to name. Read Winston Churchill's article regarding Islam back in the l9th century....read Martin Amis' "Horrorism..." decades ago. Read Robert Spencer's posts for the past decade, at least...these are just surface articles, postings and thoughts that lay out for the normal, decent, honest human being what Islam and Muslims are that get caught up in this religion for whatever reasons. The only religion of the three greats that was begun by a man running for his life and looking for what all these types look to: money, power, fame and the ability to do as they please whenever they please however they please. He choose the military and suppression to get his way. Do Americans think this ISIS a new phenomenon? Has our education been so degraded and the media so blind with progressive bias that they could not see what was right in front of their eyes? So, our President is going to degrade an evil that literally lives in the soil of the Middle East through the blood shed by people? Please. This type of evil springs out of the soil throughout hominid history...it is not only in the soil of the earth, but in the soul of a large swath of the population that believes they have the right to tell all others how to live, think, breathe and, if not, why then, lose your head, money, position...choose your poison. While our Republic was able to contain somewhat those who think like ISIS for a time, they have gotten into the marrow of this country and, even they do not believe what they are seeing or hearing. Welcome to the future folks...as usual, they come thee and me.
I sit here, a 7 decades old lady, and would cry if I thought there was any hope for this great country. There isn't. President Obama, his supporters and allies did not, do not nor will they understand the threat that Islam via any group you wish to name. Read Winston Churchill's article regarding Islam back in the l9th century....read Martin Amis' "Horrorism..." decades ago. Read Robert Spencer's posts for the past decade, at least...these are just surface articles, postings and thoughts that lay out for the normal, decent, honest human being what Islam and Muslims are that get caught up in this religion for whatever reasons. The only religion of the three greats that was begun by a man running for his life and looking for what all these types look to: money, power, fame and the ability to do as they please whenever they please however they please. He choose the military and suppression to get his way. Do Americans think this ISIS a new phenomenon? Has our education been so degraded and the media so blind with progressive bias that they could not see what was right in front of their eyes? So, our President is going to degrade an evil that literally lives in the soil of the Middle East through the blood shed by people? Please. This type of evil springs out of the soil throughout hominid history...it is not only in the soil of the earth, but in the soul of a large swath of the population that believes they have the right to tell all others how to live, think, breathe and, if not, why then, lose your head, money, position...choose your poison. While our Republic was able to contain somewhat those who think like ISIS for a time, they have gotten into the marrow of this country and, even they do not believe what they are seeing or hearing. Welcome to the future folks...as usual, they come thee and me.
Saturday, February 15, 2014
Tuesday, February 04, 2014
Tuesday, January 28, 2014
Saturday, January 18, 2014
Friday, January 17, 2014
Wednesday, January 15, 2014
Saturday, January 11, 2014
Friday, January 10, 2014
![[TypeKey Profile Page]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_v52ZWQ6snW1aSP0mNy3j9q6LEsr0n_01b6tbrud6ORpSB5VO7Cr_3uIDPamCzWVKPeaGuDk2Fm3_7oSdGsVxQzJl0Vn8FWk002Zd8=s0-d)
Thursday, January 09, 2014
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Personally, I can't wait for the Caliphate to come to America under Sharia Law....then we'll see just who exactly you are so afraid of. When my head is bobbing down that blood flooded street, my only consolation is that yours will be bobbing in front, behind and beside mine. Kudos to liberal orthodoxy!!!! Long live the tinfoil hatted leftist loons running our universities.